Here are some differences I have noticed between our Nepali rulers stuck in 19th/20th century status quo and the 21st century relevant leaders that Nepal probably wants.
|
|
| Romanticizes on 19th & 20th century ideologies without evolving. | are pragmatic and willing to change views when proved by facts and research |
| Believe in ‘Win – Lose’ | Believe in ‘Win -Win’ |
| Teaches followers to ‘follow’ | Mentor followers to ‘lead’ |
| Transparency is ‘dreaded’ | Transparency is ‘compulsory’ |
| Accountable to only ‘followers’ | Accountable to ‘citizens’ |
| Response style: “beat around the bush” | Response style: Straight to the point . |
| Over-promises, under-delivers | Under-promises, over-delivers |
| Good speeches | Good outcomes |
| Divide and rule | Unite and rule |
| Focuses on differences | Focuses on “common points” |
| End justifies the means | Means justify the ends. |
| Politics is about convincing (others) | Politics is about delivering (results) |
| Focuses on ‘rights’ only | Focuses on ‘rights with responsibility’ |
| talks more and is receptive to problem | listens more and is receptive to solution |
| is reluctant to change in leadership | is open to change in leadership |
| Only Reacts to situation. (Reactive) | Responds to situation. (proactive) |
| Conflicting visions for the future | Has vision for the future with plans and team ready |